Fanfiction - First Officer's Report Log - Pending
Over a month ago
Commander Zephyr'Shephard, Universal Government of Planets Armada
Systematic Earthly Name/Alias: Justin (original)/Brandon Mackey
USA, Earth (Arda), 4:10Am 9/5/10 Earth Date CE
Safe Havens (Sponsored)
Extra-Exploration & Mining in the Future :: Self Reliance-Efficiency ("mining" & Upgrade)
Pending Leniency
Dude, if Eden was a hypothetical real planet in the future, is it totally safe to live on? A Safe Haven? Would it be a homeworld/planetary capital for a particular race/species (a moon could be habitable, and they are not called planets... ei; Io Prime/if Jupiter's moon was habitable???)? Is it Multiracial (Xenospecies)? Safe for other species seeking refuge? What's more ideal for comfortable refuge/living... a hypothetical planetary/lunar capitol, galactic metropolis, a rural colony, metro-colony, a unpopulated planet/moon that's a complete private property (claimed or bought by someone or some organization), luxury space station/ship, or what? there's probably billions of habitable moons and planets out there in this one galaxy alone (Milkyway).
no romance...from no one. I'm sure some Captain guy in the future being fully aware then wouldn't be interested in them from the start, strictly platonic (i'm sure he's not a homosexual either).
Man on a Mission = hypothetical valid point... hypothetical interference.
certainly seem as if stuff has nothing to do with the actual interests of emotions... yet their own self interest of advantages in mind. some commander character doesn't care either way.
let commander N7/007-101 stay out...
just stop impeding some guy's "mission's progress". And Shut the Fuck up about Windows and Trains if he was already out numerous of times without the usage of them, why not keep mr. commander out then versus hinting he needs to get himself out with windows, pills, and trains? Why when he tries the whole (red) pills option nothing works, he's not out? What was Ian all about then? Why not keep some guy out?
-----------------------
-----------------------
What is that Zorah'Quarian's real job in the future? i'm not interested in Love/Sexual Interest stuff (not with anyone)... in shephard sense it's considered interference and imposed impedance to his mission and stuff, slowing him down...big time.
how come they can't just be a normal non-emotional crew member? What professional positions onboard a ship that's available for them to legitimately work?
how come their character just can't be a yeoman, or a personal assistant or something?
i mean shephard's allowed to have pets on the normandy right?
are we allowed to label a quarian as a diplomatic/non-enslaved "pet" (using hypothetical 2nd class citizen stuff as a alternative option...where as they're not considered a slave, or
"lesser")? A "pet" with liberty?
what are the hypothetical lenient options of having some alien remain onboard the ship that does not involve emotional liaison annoyance?
I'm sure some Commander guy can nullify and dismiss complaints/write-ups that are written in the disadvantage of a quarian/other crew members in the future, in compliance that they don't have any interpersonal interests/physical interaction with a commander in a docile state of consciousness. "Hey if you leave me the fuck alone and stop touching me, i'd probably consider caring about your hypothetical weary and problems...and maybe even try and help out... deal? Terms of Agreement of checking your weird emotions please. And keep me the fuck out of this deliberately locked system, and stop getting in my fucking way with your personal feelings crap. If you can agree to that, then i'll help you with what ever problem you have in the future.", Commander Shephard.
-------------------
Even though Shephard has done absolutely nothing wrong, in anyway... he doesn't have to appeal to anyone for the stuff they're responsible for... dude is beyond liable to ignore the crap out of specific people in the future...
no LI's, no LI's... shephard doesn't want relationships.. Shephard (pertaining stuff of the future only, nothing to do with earth)... would totally sponsor/purchase whatever residence for particular people in the future to just live in for themselves safely, comfortable and etc without ever interacting with this shephard character again, not having anything to do with them in the future... they can chose, select, promote a hypothetical idea of whatever location they would like to reside in, and some hypothetical shephard character would totally sponsor it. "like here, no relationships with anyone (x3)... take this money and go live someplace nice, comfortable and safe...and or you can be a platonic pet goat, not in anyway or shape thought of as a trophy... i'm taking off in my starship and fly off to missions and stuff. Commander Shephard supports Star Trek's Morning After Treatments.", shephard
it's hypothetically their choice and stuff... to be completely ignored to a maximum degree/no redemption later in the future or to be granted with neutral-platonic super-leniency if there's logical compliance?
P.S.: man that Star Trek(Star Wars) Docking Scene seem like super Deja Vu of 2005...
Spock totally had the first iPad (2010) (Star trek XI 2009) (Star trek TOS SE3 1968 = tablet pc presentation) (Star Trek TNG 1989 = Flatpanel Desktop presentation)
End Log.
Systematic Earthly Name/Alias: Justin (original)/Brandon Mackey
USA, Earth (Arda), 4:10Am 9/5/10 Earth Date CE
Safe Havens (Sponsored)
Extra-Exploration & Mining in the Future :: Self Reliance-Efficiency ("mining" & Upgrade)
Pending Leniency
Dude, if Eden was a hypothetical real planet in the future, is it totally safe to live on? A Safe Haven? Would it be a homeworld/planetary capital for a particular race/species (a moon could be habitable, and they are not called planets... ei; Io Prime/if Jupiter's moon was habitable???)? Is it Multiracial (Xenospecies)? Safe for other species seeking refuge? What's more ideal for comfortable refuge/living... a hypothetical planetary/lunar capitol, galactic metropolis, a rural colony, metro-colony, a unpopulated planet/moon that's a complete private property (claimed or bought by someone or some organization), luxury space station/ship, or what? there's probably billions of habitable moons and planets out there in this one galaxy alone (Milkyway).
no romance...from no one. I'm sure some Captain guy in the future being fully aware then wouldn't be interested in them from the start, strictly platonic (i'm sure he's not a homosexual either).
Man on a Mission = hypothetical valid point... hypothetical interference.
certainly seem as if stuff has nothing to do with the actual interests of emotions... yet their own self interest of advantages in mind. some commander character doesn't care either way.
let commander N7/007-101 stay out...
just stop impeding some guy's "mission's progress". And Shut the Fuck up about Windows and Trains if he was already out numerous of times without the usage of them, why not keep mr. commander out then versus hinting he needs to get himself out with windows, pills, and trains? Why when he tries the whole (red) pills option nothing works, he's not out? What was Ian all about then? Why not keep some guy out?
-----------------------
-----------------------
What is that Zorah'Quarian's real job in the future? i'm not interested in Love/Sexual Interest stuff (not with anyone)... in shephard sense it's considered interference and imposed impedance to his mission and stuff, slowing him down...big time.
how come they can't just be a normal non-emotional crew member? What professional positions onboard a ship that's available for them to legitimately work?
how come their character just can't be a yeoman, or a personal assistant or something?
i mean shephard's allowed to have pets on the normandy right?
are we allowed to label a quarian as a diplomatic/non-enslaved "pet" (using hypothetical 2nd class citizen stuff as a alternative option...where as they're not considered a slave, or
"lesser")? A "pet" with liberty?
what are the hypothetical lenient options of having some alien remain onboard the ship that does not involve emotional liaison annoyance?
I'm sure some Commander guy can nullify and dismiss complaints/write-ups that are written in the disadvantage of a quarian/other crew members in the future, in compliance that they don't have any interpersonal interests/physical interaction with a commander in a docile state of consciousness. "Hey if you leave me the fuck alone and stop touching me, i'd probably consider caring about your hypothetical weary and problems...and maybe even try and help out... deal? Terms of Agreement of checking your weird emotions please. And keep me the fuck out of this deliberately locked system, and stop getting in my fucking way with your personal feelings crap. If you can agree to that, then i'll help you with what ever problem you have in the future.", Commander Shephard.
-------------------
Even though Shephard has done absolutely nothing wrong, in anyway... he doesn't have to appeal to anyone for the stuff they're responsible for... dude is beyond liable to ignore the crap out of specific people in the future...
no LI's, no LI's... shephard doesn't want relationships.. Shephard (pertaining stuff of the future only, nothing to do with earth)... would totally sponsor/purchase whatever residence for particular people in the future to just live in for themselves safely, comfortable and etc without ever interacting with this shephard character again, not having anything to do with them in the future... they can chose, select, promote a hypothetical idea of whatever location they would like to reside in, and some hypothetical shephard character would totally sponsor it. "like here, no relationships with anyone (x3)... take this money and go live someplace nice, comfortable and safe...and or you can be a platonic pet goat, not in anyway or shape thought of as a trophy... i'm taking off in my starship and fly off to missions and stuff. Commander Shephard supports Star Trek's Morning After Treatments.", shephard
it's hypothetically their choice and stuff... to be completely ignored to a maximum degree/no redemption later in the future or to be granted with neutral-platonic super-leniency if there's logical compliance?
P.S.: man that Star Trek(Star Wars) Docking Scene seem like super Deja Vu of 2005...
Spock totally had the first iPad (2010) (Star trek XI 2009) (Star trek TOS SE3 1968 = tablet pc presentation) (Star Trek TNG 1989 = Flatpanel Desktop presentation)
End Log.
You must be logged in to leave comments on this blog.